Articles
6 October 2025

Surgical complications after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a Latin American perspective by age

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common among aging women and frequently requires surgical intervention. Concerns about increased surgical risk in elderly patients often lead to conservative treatment. However, evidence from low- and middle-income countries, including Latin America, remains scarce. The objective of this study is to compare perioperative and 1-year postoperative complications between women aged ≥60 and <60 undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery in a tertiary center. A nested case-control study within a retrospective cohort was conducted, including women who underwent POP surgery. Two age groups were analyzed: <60 years and ≥60 years. Complication rates were compared using chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Among 231 patients, 79 were aged ≥60 years. Perioperative complications occurred in 10.4% of older vs. 22.1% of younger women. Respectively, 1-year complications were 12.9% vs. 17.2%. De novo urgency was more frequent in older women (25.3%, p=0.02). No major complications were observed. POP surgery in women aged ≥60 appears safe. Findings support surgical management in elderly patients based on functional rather than chronological age.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

World Health Organization. Ageing and life course. 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/ageing/en/.
Instituto Nacional de las Personas Adultas Mayores. Estadísticas sobre adultos mayores en México. 2016. Available from: http://www.gob.mx/inapam/galerias/estadisticas-sobre-adultos-mayores-en-mexico.
Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:165-94.
Thys SD, Roovers JP, Geomini PM, Bongers MY. Do patients prefer a pessary or surgery as primary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse? Gynecol Obstet Invest 2012;74:6-12.
Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2016;16:157-68.
Farthmann J, Watermann D, Zamperoni H, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in elderly patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295:1421-5.
Smith FJ, Holman CDJ, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1096-100.
Gultekin FA, Wong MT, Podevin J, et al. Safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the elderly: results from a nationwide database. Dis Colon Rectum 2015;58:339-43.
Gabriel B, Rubod C, Córdova LG, et al. Prolapse surgery in women of 80 years and older using the Prolift™ technique. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:1463-70.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
Roth TM. Pyometra and recurrent prolapse after Le Fort colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:687-8.
Kaplan HS. Sex, intimacy, and the aging process. J Am Acad Psychoanal 1990;18:185-205.
Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Clifton MM, Goldman HB. Evaluation and management of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women. Clin Geriatr Med 2015;31:507-21.

How to Cite



Surgical complications after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a Latin American perspective by age. (2025). Urogynaecologia, 37. https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2025.351