Articles

Factors associated with anterior compartment recurrence after laparoscopic sacropexy

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 10 November 2026
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with anatomical anterior compartment recurrence after laparoscopic mesh sacropexy. This single-center ambispective cohort study included 143 women who underwent laparoscopic mesh sacropexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Women operated on before initiation of the study were identified retrospectively from institutional surgical records and subsequently recalled for postoperative anatomical assessment, whereas patients treated during the later study period were followed longitudinally. Only women with an anatomical postoperative assessment performed ≥12 months after surgery were included. Anatomical anterior compartment recurrence was evaluated using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) measurements. Associations with recurrence were examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Recurrence occurred in 18 women (12.6%). Patients with recurrence were older and had greater preoperative descent of the upper anterior vaginal wall (POP-Q point Ba). In the primary multivariable model, age [odds ratio (OR) 1.09/year, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.17; p=0.007], Ba (OR 1.29/cm, 95% CI 1.00-1.66; p=0.048), and anterior dissection length (OR 0.81/cm, 95% CI 0.67-0.98; p=0.034) were associated with recurrence. Body mass index was not independently associated. Adjustment for the year of surgery attenuated the dissection association (p=0.127). Greater preoperative Ba and increasing age were associated with anterior recurrence. Greater anterior dissection was associated with lower recurrence odds in the primary model, but this finding was sensitive to adjustments for the surgical year.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:805-23.
Santis-Moya F, Pineda R, Miranda V. Preoperative ultrasound findings as risk factors of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2021;32:955-60.
Larson KA, Luo J, Guire KE, et al. 3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:285-93.
Chen L, Lisse S, Larson K, et al. Structural failure sites in anterior vaginal wall prolapse: identification of a collinear triad. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:853-62.
Lamblin G, Delorme E, Cosson M, Rubod C. Cystocele and functional anatomy of the pelvic floor: review and update of the various theories. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1297-305.
Bowen ST, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD, et al. Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:506.e1-506.e28.
Wong V, Shek KL, Goh J, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;49:404-8.
Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M, et al. Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:192-208.
Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2018;29:13-21.
Shi W, Guo L. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse: a meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol 2023;43:2160929.
Yeung E, Malacova E, Maher C. Is levator ani avulsion a risk factor for prolapse recurrence? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2022;33:1813-26.
Saputra AND, Rizal DM, Ayuandari S, Pangastuti N. The difference in collagen type-1 expression in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2022;33:1803-12.
Tian Z, Li Q, Wang X, Sun Z. The difference in extracellular matrix metabolism in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2024;131:1029-41.
Aslam MF, Osmundsen B, Edwards SR, et al. Preoperative prolapse stage as predictor of failure of sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016;22:156-60.
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-7.
Turner LC, Lavelle ES, Lowder JL, Shepherd JP. The impact of obesity on intraoperative complications and prolapse recurrence after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016;22:317-23.
Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, IntHout J, et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:252.e1-9.

How to Cite



Aliyeva, R. (2026). Factors associated with anterior compartment recurrence after laparoscopic sacropexy. Urogynaecologia, 38. https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2026.386