Articles

Robotic vesicovaginal fistula repair using double-layer urachal and omental flap interposition: a retrospective case series

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 20 May 2026
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) remains a challenging condition requiring precise surgical repair to achieve durable closure, and robotic-assisted techniques provide enhanced visualization and dexterity, particularly in complex or recurrent cases. This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of a double-layer interposition technique using urachal and omental flaps in 5 patients who underwent robotic transabdominal VVF repair between January 2023 and June 2025, all of whom had supratrigonal fistulae confirmed by cystoscopy and computed tomography urography + cystography. The surgical approach involved layered closure of the fistula tract followed by placement of vascularized urachal and omental flaps, with perioperative parameters, postoperative complications, and fistula closure rates recorded. The mean patient age was 46.2 years; hysterectomy was the predominant etiology in 80% of cases; 3 patients had previously failed transvaginal repair, and the mean fistula size was 1.8 cm. The mean operative time was 178 minutes with a mean blood loss of 90 mL, and no intraoperative complications were observed; 1 patient developed a Clavien-Dindo grade II urinary tract infection postoperatively. Complete fistula closure was demonstrated in all patients on postoperative cystography, with catheter removal between 16 and 21 days, and at a mean follow-up of 8.6 months, all patients remained continent without recurrence, suggesting that robotic-assisted VVF repair with combined urachal and omental flap interposition is safe, feasible, and associated with excellent short-term outcomes, with dual-layer reinforcement providing improved vascular support and suture-line separation that may reduce recurrence in complex or previously failed cases, although larger prospective studies are required for further validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Kapoor R, Ansari MS, Singh P, et al. Management of vesicovaginal fistula: changing trends. Indian J Urol 2007;23:123-8.
Ockrim JL, Greenwell TJ, Foley CL, et al. A tertiary experience of vesico-vaginal and urethro-vaginal fistula repair: factors predicting success. BJU Int 2009;103:1122-6.
Tavares M, do Carmo Pinto M, Conde Carvalho G, Silva-Ramos M. Vesicovaginal fistula robotics-assisted repair: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Int Urogynecol J 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06578-8.
Chandna A, Mavuduru RS, Bora GS, et al. Robot-assisted repair of complex vesicovaginal fistulae: feasibility and outcomes. Urology 2020;144:92-8.
Miklos JR, Moore RD, Chinthakanan O. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted vesicovaginal fistula repair: systematic review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:727-36.
Körner SK, Olsen KØ, Jensen JB. Robot-assisted vesicovaginal fistula repair - initial experience. Scand J Urol 2020;54:147-9.
Basatac C, Cicek MC. Vesicocutaneous fistula treatment by using omental flap interposition. J Surg Case Rep 2015;2015:rjv004.

How to Cite



Robotic vesicovaginal fistula repair using double-layer urachal and omental flap interposition: a retrospective case series. (2026). Urogynaecologia, 38. https://doi.org/10.4081/uij.2026.364